10,000+
queries referenced in Princeton GEO research
Tailored for Content Platforms and Growth Teams
Breaking past standard technical checkpoints. Our analysis engine unites structured data testing, E-E-A-T evaluations, and leading GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) algorithms to uncover your true visibility in the era of AI search.
10,000+
queries referenced in Princeton GEO research
+30–115%
AI visibility lift from source citations
Data Driven
Providing actionable and clear optimization guidelines
The engine is performing multi-layer analysis on your page. You can track real-time progress below.
Leave a valid email to receive a concise confirmation and follow-up resources, including remediation templates and high-impact GEO checklists.
Tip: use your primary inbox to avoid missing priority optimization briefs.
The analysis follows a two-layer model: rapid script checks handle deterministic code structure, while a powerful semantic engine evaluates the meaning and trustworthiness of your text.
Verifies OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, and /llms.txt discoverability protocols.
Audits JSON-LD microdata, WebApplication markup, and authoritative entity graphs.
Measures TL;DR direct answer density and self-contained snippet extraction suitability.
Detects trust signals, about/contact/privacy pages, and verifiable external citations.
💡 Tip: Enter any public URL above and click Start Diagnostic to inspect full results
The engine runs deterministic checks & LLM semantic reasoning, outputting an exportable PDF.
Empirical breakdowns, protocol analysis, and answer-first architectures to boost your brand's citations in AI search.
Empirical tests across 10,000+ queries show that primary source citations increase AI summary selection by 30% to 115%, while statistical data points provide a +40% uplift.
AI search bots bypass client-side render cycles to save latency. Serving clean semantic HTML5 with microdata reduces crawler timeouts and guarantees immediate ingestion.
Generative engines look for explicit entity graphs. Utilizing 'about', 'mentions', and '@id' URIs establishes permanent semantic relationships that survive LLM context tokenization.
Explore all GEO and AI Crawler Research Briefs
Includes SearchGPT readiness checklists, Perplexity guidelines, and Schema templates
Crucial elements like robots.txt, sitemap.xml, canonical tags, heading hierarchies, schema markup, and /llms.txt configurations are algorithmically validated.
The engine evaluates E-E-A-T by assessing author expertise, credible citations, content freshness, and depth of topical specificity.
Instead of measuring keyword density, the engine scores your page's potential to be quoted by AI based on answer-first structures, data statistics, strict citations, and snippet readiness.
Our assessment model extends foundational SEO guidelines and is deeply rooted in cutting-edge academic AI citation research, aimed at elevating machine readability.
Princeton KDD 2024 research tested more than 10,000 queries and found that source citations can raise AI visibility by +30–115%, statistics by about +40%, and quotation additions by roughly +30–40%.
Therefore, our auditing methodology favors answer-first sections, machine-readable schema, authoritative external links, and self-contained paragraphs instead of keyword stuffing.
Classic SEO typically prioritizes indexability and organic search results pages, whereas GEO focuses on optimizing content to be easily summarized and cited by conversational AI and generative search functions (e.g., Perplexity, AI Overviews).
Having a well-formatted /llms.txt file natively provides language models with the clear bounds and structured context they inherently prefer, maximizing your content's discoverability.
Signals like author expertise, transparent trust pages, verifiable references, and temporal freshness are mathematically tallied, but the final dimension focuses on whether the content relies on specific evidence versus generic summaries.